Binance fees: maker, taker and VIP tiers
Binance fees at a glance
For a $10,000 BTC market buy, the September 25, 2026 sweep measured 5.13 bps on Binance. That cost placed 23 of 43 venues. In the same sweep, Hyperliquid measured 4.56 bps, 0.57 bps less than Binance. Taker orders at VIP 0 pay 0.050% on Binance, level with the median of 19 venues, and maker orders pay 0.020%. With $25B of 30-day volume, the taker rate goes down to 0.017%. The schedule has 10 levels.
Every VIP level also needs a BNB balance, so volume alone does not move a Binance account up. A taker rate of 0.030% or less needs $600M on Binance, the highest volume for that rate of 12 ladders here, level with KuCoin. At VIP 9, the top level, makers pay 0% and takers pay 0.017%. The widest volume gap is from VIP 3 to VIP 4: VIP 4 needs 12 times the volume and cuts the taker rate by only 0.2 bps.
Binance fee conditions, funding and leverage
Binance settles funding every 8 hours by default. The Binance BTC perpetual allows leverage of up to 150x.
- Fee payment in BNB gives a 10% discount: 0.0180% maker and 0.0450% taker at the Regular User level. binance.com, read September 23, 2026.
- VIP 1 needs 5 BNB and $5,000,000 of 30-day volume. binance.com, read September 23, 2026.
- Regular-user crypto spot pays 0.10% maker and 0.10% taker. BNB payment discounts, regional schedules and USDC-quoted pairs use separate terms. binance.com, read September 14, 2026.
- The fundingInfo endpoint gives 8 hours for BTCUSDT. Some other symbols settle every 4 hours, so the interval is per symbol. fapi.binance.com, read September 23, 2026.
Our partner account sets a 20% trading-fee discount for Binance accounts opened with the PerpFinder link. Binance referral terms.
Binance fee tiers by 30-day volume
The maker rate falls to 0% at VIP 9, from $25B of volume. The largest taker cut is from VIP 1 to VIP 2: 0.050% to 0.040%. VIP 1 keeps the base taker rate and lowers only the maker rate.
| Level | 30-day volume from | Maker | Taker |
|---|---|---|---|
| VIP 0 | $0 | 0.020% | 0.050% |
| VIP 1 | $5M | 0.018% | 0.050% |
| VIP 2 | $10M | 0.016% | 0.040% |
| VIP 3 | $50M | 0.012% | 0.032% |
| VIP 4 | $600M | 0.010% | 0.030% |
| VIP 5 | $1B | 0.008% | 0.027% |
| VIP 6 | $2.5B | 0.006% | 0.025% |
| VIP 7 | $5B | 0.004% | 0.022% |
| VIP 8 | $12.5B | 0.002% | 0.020% |
| VIP 9 | $25B | 0% | 0.017% |
Binance fees vs Hyperliquid and Bybit
On the base taker rate, Binance sits 0.5 bps below Bybit and 0.5 bps above Hyperliquid.
| Metric | Binance | Hyperliquid | Bybit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base maker | 0.020% | 0.015% | 0.020% |
| Base taker | 0.050% | 0.045% | 0.055% |
| Lowest ladder taker | 0.017% from $25B | 0.024% from $7B | 0.035% from $50M |
| Measured BTC buy, $10,000, bps | 5.13 | 4.56 | 5.51 |
| Funding interval, hours | 8 | 1 | 8 |
Measured cost of a Binance market buy
A $1,000,000 BTC buy cost 6.41 bps on Binance, 1.29 bps more than the $10,000 buy.
| Cost part | BTC $10,000 | BTC $100,000 | BTC $1,000,000 | ETH $10,000 | ETH $100,000 | ETH $1,000,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place in the sweep | 23 of 43 | 24 of 42 | 15 of 37 | 16 of 43 | 14 of 42 | 6 of 35 |
| Taker fee, bps | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Half of the spread, bps | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Price impact, bps | 0.12 | 0.83 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| All-in cost, bps | 5.13 | 5.84 | 6.41 | 5.02 | 5.02 | 5.61 |
| All-in cost, USD | $5.13 | $58.37 | $641.21 | $5.02 | $50.18 | $561.25 |
Worked example: a $10,000 round trip on Binance
Hypothetical: a $10,000 Binance position opens and closes at one price, so only the trading fees apply.
| Leg | Taker + taker, VIP 0 | Maker + taker, VIP 0 | Taker + taker, VIP 5 ($1B) | Taker + taker, 20% referral discount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee to open | $5.00 | $2.00 | $2.70 | $4.00 |
| Fee to close | $5.00 | $5.00 | $2.70 | $4.00 |
| Fee for both legs | $10.00 | $7.00 | $5.40 | $8.00 |
More on Binance
Sources
- Base rates: binance.com, read September 23, 2026
- BTC leverage cap: binance.com
- Funding interval: fapi.binance.com
- Measured cost: PerpFinder cost methodology